Detecting AI-Generated Video

A Vision-Language Dual-View Survey for factual fidelity verification

Association for Computational Linguistics logo ACL 2026 EMM-QA ICML 2026 Workshop logo ICML 2026 EMM-QA Workshop
Updated July 20, 2026 · 83 representative 2026 methods · strict video-first scope

Dylan Xinming Hou1, Juntian Zhang2, Xu Gu2, Yichen Wu3, Nils Lukas1, Gus Xia1, Xiuying Chen1, Yuhan Liu1

MBZUAI 1 MBZUAI
Renmin University of China 2 Renmin University of China
Harvard University 3 Harvard University

† Corresponding author: Yuhan Liu · yuhan.liu@mbzuai.ac.ae

As video generators move from localized edits to fully synthetic, cinematic scenes, artifact-centric detection is no longer enough. This survey reframes AIGC-V detection as factual fidelity verification: whether the events, entities, and physical processes depicted in a video remain consistent with the real world.

Core Framing

From artifact matching to evidence tracing.

Modern AI-generated video cannot be understood through frame artifacts alone. Detection must combine low-level intrinsic cues, spatiotemporal consistency, cross-modal consistency, and language-guided world-level reasoning.

Problem

Factual Fidelity Verification

The task is not only to label a clip as fake, but to identify which claim, event, entity, or temporal segment breaks consistency with reality.

Taxonomy

Vision-Language Dual-View

The visual side covers intrinsic cues and spatiotemporal consistency inside the clip, while the language side covers cross-modal consistency and language-guided world-level reasoning.

Deployment

Evidence-First Detection

Trustworthy systems should identify, localize, and explain with structured evidence instead of collapsing everything into a single score.

AIGC-V detection overview figure

The survey links generation settings, dual-view evidence pathways, and final verification outputs in a single end-to-end detection framing.

Generation Side

Three paradigms reshape where the evidence lives.

The survey organizes AI-generated video into three broad paradigms. Each one changes which cues are most useful, and therefore which detection strategies remain reliable.

Overview of three AIGC-V paradigms

The evidence profile shifts as generation moves from real-carrier manipulation to fully synthetic video synthesis.

LMV

Local Manipulation

Real footage is preserved while localized regions or attributes are re-rendered. The strongest evidence is often spatially concentrated and residual.

  • Best matched with intrinsic visual cues and transfer-oriented forensic tests.
  • Representative threat: face swaps, partial attribute editing, localized tampering.
AVE

Audio-Visual Editing

Speech drives the visual stream, making synchrony, speaker consistency, and speech-conditioned motion more decisive than generic image artifacts.

  • Cross-modal alignment and localization become central.
  • Representative threat: dubbing, talking-head generation, lip-sync editing.
GVS

Generative Video Synthesis

No authentic carrier remains. Detection shifts toward long-range coherence, world plausibility, provenance, and language-guided verification.

  • Motivates stronger Layer 2 to Layer 4 reasoning.
  • Representative threat: text-to-video, prompt-conditioned open-domain synthesis.
Detection Side

The dual-view, four-layer taxonomy.

The taxonomy is organized by the dominant evidence pathway used for decision-making, not by a rigid task label. It moves from low-level perception to high-level cognition while keeping the boundary between layers operational.

Dual-view four-layer taxonomy figure

Visual view: Layers 1-2. Language view: Layers 3-4. The boundary depends on what evidence the detector actually needs.

Visual View

Perceptual evidence inside the video

Focuses on the visual modality and emphasizes statistical differences between AIGC-V and real videos. The pathway extends from frame-level intrinsic cues to spatiotemporal consistency across frames, forming the perceptual perspective for factual-fidelity verification.

L1

Intrinsic Cue Analysis

Tests whether low-level visual signals still follow the statistical regularities of real videos, including frequency fingerprints, local geometry, physiological traces, and residual synthesis artifacts.

Boundary L1-2: Layer 1 focuses on frame-level intrinsic distributional cues.
L2

Spatiotemporal Consistency

Models frame-sequence relations to test whether motion, behavior, and physical transitions unfold plausibly over time as a real recorded video.

Boundary L1-2 / L2-3: Layer 2 moves beyond frames to explicitly model spatiotemporal connections across the frame sequence, but it still stays within the visual modality and evaluates within-visual coherence.
Language View

Grounded verification across semantics and world knowledge

Defines a grounded verification pathway in which audio, speech, text, and visual evidence are first checked for within-video consistency, then extended to factual and knowledge-level verification when external evidence is required.

L3

Cross-Modal Consistency

Performs within-video multimodal verification across speech, text, and visuals, from lip-speech synchrony to voice-face identity coherence and speech-text agreement.

Boundary L2-3 / L3-4: Layer 3 goes beyond vision and relies on within-video cross-modal agreement, judging whether different modalities are mutually consistent in describing the same semantics.
L4

Language-Guided World-Level Reasoning

Moves beyond within-video agreement to verify implied claims against external facts, commonsense, physical rules, and explicit evidence chains.

Boundary L3-4: Layer 4 further requires external facts, commonsense, or physics for reasoning-based verification, even when the modalities appear mutually consistent.
Operational boundary: Evidence arrives through two complementary pathways: the visual view tests intrinsic and temporal plausibility, while the language view moves from within-video cross-modal verification to explicit claim checking and world-level reasoning. The split is decided by the detector's dominant evidence pathway.
Methods

A field shifting toward the language view.

The landscape figure highlights the transition from artifact matching in traditional deepfake detection to evidence-based semantic verification enabled by vision-language models and agentic pipelines.

Landscape of representative AIGC-V detection methods
Representative AIGC-V detection methods aligned with the four-layer taxonomy.
Layer 1 Remain foundational, but increasingly only the first signal rather than the whole detector. Pixel and geometric artifacts, physiology, robustness.
Layer 2 Become the visual center of gravity as single-frame artifacts grow less reliable. Motion inconsistency, physics, human behavior.
Layer 3 Moving to a mainstream verification pathway. Audio-visual agreement, text-video reasoning, localization.
Layer 4 Rising quickly as high-realism videos demand explicit evidence-first explainable checking. Prompts, tools, retrieval, preference and reward modeling.

These cards summarize the broader migration pattern across layers, while the table below adds a clearly marked partial snapshot through July 20, 2026.

Year L1 L2 L3 L4 Visual Language Language-View Share
2020 5 7 1 0 12 1 yearly / cumulative
2021 5 6 4 0 11 4 yearly / cumulative
2022 4 3 2 0 7 2 yearly / cumulative
2023 3 3 4 0 6 4 yearly / cumulative
2024 9 5 4 3 14 7 yearly / cumulative
2025 1 22 20 15 23 35 yearly / cumulative
2026* 12 32 30 9 44 39 yearly / cumulative

Complete publication years are shown through 2025. The 2026* row is an in-progress snapshot frozen on July 20, 2026; yearly and cumulative shares use the same video-first method-corpus counting rule as the paper.

Benchmarks

Evaluation needs diagnostic depth, not only scores.

Benchmark design should reveal why factual fidelity fails, where the failure occurs, and whether the system can ground its explanation with checkable evidence.

LMV · 19 benchmarks

Local Manipulation Video

The deepest protocol tradition, emphasizing localized forensic residue, compression robustness, and cross-dataset transfer.

AVE · 17 benchmarks

Audio-Visual Editing

Smaller but tightly aligned with synchrony, speaker-content consistency, and timestamped localization.

GVS · 30 benchmarks

Generative Video Synthesis

Rapidly changing benchmarks targeting cross-generator transfer, semantic fabrication, plausibility, and world-level reasoning.

Adjacency · 25 diagnostics

Physics, World Dynamics, Explanation

Adjacent diagnostics matter because trustworthy detection increasingly depends on physical plausibility and grounded explanations.

What the next benchmark regime should look like Claim-level supervision, timestamped evidence, shortcut-resistant stress tests, and continuously refreshed generator pools are all necessary if AIGC-V detection is to stay relevant under fast-moving model turnover.
Paper List

The Awesome venue-first paper library.

Browse the categorized paper and benchmark index supporting a survey corpus of 298 video-centered works, with verified venue-year labels and compact paper links.

Complete categorized index

Move across paradigms, detection layers, and benchmark families. April--July additions appear inside their canonical categories, and every new classification follows the detector's decisive evidence source.

Navigation Tip

Use Methods Overview for the taxonomy first, then switch to paradigms, layer pages, or benchmark families when you want a more specific slice of the literature.

Overview

Repository-level entry points and the complete flattened list.

Generation Paradigms

Navigate by manipulation type and synthesis regime.

Detection Layers

Follow the survey taxonomy from intrinsic cues to world-level reasoning.

Benchmarks and Diagnostics

Inspect evaluation families and adjacent diagnostic testbeds.

Select a route above to update the reading panel below.

Loading the selected library view.

📚 Paper List

A flat, paper-first index in the same style as the reference list. Detailed notes and extra metadata stay on the linked section pages.

Paradigms

Local Manipulation

  • arXiv 2025 FakeParts: a New Family of AI-Generated DeepFakes. [paper]
  • CIKM 2025 FakeChain: Exposing Shallow Cues in Multi-Step Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • ICCV 2025 DynamicFace: High-quality and consistent face swapping for image and video using composable 3D facial priors. [paper]
  • NeurIPS 2024 FuseAnyPart: Diffusion-Driven Facial Parts Swapping via Multiple Reference Images. [paper]

Audio-Visual Editing

  • arXiv 2025 SayAnything: Audio-Driven Lip Synchronization with Conditional Video Diffusion. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 Audio-visual Controlled Video Diffusion with Masked Selective State Spaces Modeling for Natural Talking Head Generation. [paper]
  • ACM MM 2025 Ditto: Motion-Space Diffusion for Controllable Realtime Talking Head Synthesis. [paper]
  • arXiv 2023 GeneFace: Generalized and High-Fidelity Audio-Driven 3D Talking Face Synthesis. [paper]
  • SIGGRAPH Asia 2022 VideoReTalking: Audio-based Lip Synchronization for Talking Head Video Editing in the Wild. [paper]

Generative Video Synthesis

  • Official release 2026 Official Launch of Seedance 2.0. [paper]
  • IJCV 2025 Show-1: Marrying pixel and latent diffusion models for text-to-video generation. [paper]
  • Official release 2025 Kling O1: Unified Multimodal Video Model. [paper]
  • Official release 2025 Veo 3. [paper]
  • CVPR 2024 Grid diffusion models for text-to-video generation. [paper]
  • Official release 2024 Sora 2. [paper]
  • Official release 2024 Introducing Gen-3 Alpha: A New Frontier for Video Generation. [paper]
  • Official release 2024 Dream Machine. [paper]
  • ICCV 2023 Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformers. [paper]
  • arXiv 2022 Video Diffusion Models. [paper]
  • arXiv 2022 Imagen Video: High Definition Video Generation with Diffusion Models. [paper]
  • arXiv 2022 Make-A-Video: Text-to-Video Generation without Text-Video Data. [paper]

Layer 1: Intrinsic Visual Cues

A. Pixel and geometric artifacts

  • arXiv 2026 Lightweight Complementary-Cue Fusion for Robust Video Face Forgery Detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 SpecSem-Net: Integrating Spectral and Semantic Features for Robust AI-Generated Video Detection. [paper]
  • NeurIPS 2024 Freqblender: Enhancing deepfake detection by blending frequency knowledge. [paper]
  • ECCV 2024 Real appearance modeling for more general deepfake detection. [paper]
  • CVPR 2024 Beyond deepfake images: Detecting ai-generated videos. [paper]
  • AAAI 2023 Noise based deepfake detection via multi-head relative-interaction. [paper]
  • ECCV 2022 Hierarchical contrastive inconsistency learning for deepfake video detection. [paper]
  • CVPR 2021 MagDR: Mask-Guided Detection and Reconstruction for Defending Deepfakes. [paper]
  • CVPR 2021 Improving the efficiency and robustness of deepfakes detection through precise geometric features. [paper]
  • ICASSP 2019 Exposing deep fakes using inconsistent head poses. [paper]

B. Physiological features

  • The Visual Computer 2024 Local attention and long-distance interaction of rPPG for deepfake detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2022 Visual Representations of Physiological Signals for Fake Video Detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2021 Exposing deepfake with pixel-wise ar and ppg correlation from faint signals. [paper]
  • ICTC 2021 A study on effective use of bpm information in deepfake detection. [paper]
  • ACM MM 2020 Deeprhythm: Exposing deepfakes with attentional visual heartbeat rhythms. [paper]
  • arXiv 2020 Deepfakeson-phys: Deepfakes detection based on heart rate estimation. [paper]
  • IJCB 2020 How do the hearts of deep fakes beat? Deep fake source detection via interpreting residuals with biological signals. [paper]
  • IEEE TPAMI 2020 Fakecatcher: Detection of synthetic portrait videos using biological signals. [paper]
  • ICCVW 2019 Predicting Heart Rate Variations of Deepfake Videos using Neural ODE. [paper]
  • WIFS 2018 In ictu oculi: Exposing ai created fake videos by detecting eye blinking. [paper]

C. Distribution discrepancy and robustness

  • arXiv 2026 G2VD: Generalizable AI-Generated Video Detection via Counterfactual Intervention and Causal Disentanglement. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 CUPID: Reconstructing UV Texture Maps for Interpretable Person-of-Interest Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • ACM IH&MMSec 2026 Seeing the Unseen: Enhancing Synthetic Video Detector Transferability to New AI Video Generation Models via Virtual Generators. [paper]
  • CVPRW 2026 Forensic Rewiring: Circuit-Level Shortcut Suppression for Generalizable Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • CVPR 2026 DFD-HR: Generalizable Deepfake Detection via Hierarchical Routing Learning. [paper]
  • CVPR 2026 Beyond [CLS] Token: Query-Driven Token-Level Forgery Purification for Generalizable Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • CVPR 2026 Tutor-Student Reinforcement Learning: A Dynamic Curriculum for Robust Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • ICML 2026 Real Data Lies: Unveiling and Closing the Quality Shortcut in Generalizable AI-Generated Video Detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 Video as Natural Augmentation: Towards Unified AI-Generated Image and Video Detection. [paper]
  • ICDF2C 2025 Deepfake Forensics Adapter: A Dual-Stream Network for Generalizable Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • WACV 2026 Deepfake Detection that Generalizes Across Benchmarks. [paper]
  • NeurIPS 2024 Can we leave deepfake data behind in training deepfake detector? [paper]
  • ECCV 2024 Fake It till You Make It: Curricular Dynamic Forgery Augmentations Towards General Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • CVPR 2024 Transcending Forgery Specificity with Latent Space Augmentation for Generalizable Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • CVPR 2024 Exploiting style latent flows for generalizing deepfake video detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2024 Turns Out I'm Not Real: Towards Robust Detection of AI-Generated Videos. [paper]
  • ICCV 2023 Seeable: Soft discrepancies and bounded contrastive learning for exposing deepfakes. [paper]
  • ICCV 2023 Quality-agnostic deepfake detection with intra-model collaborative learning. [paper]
  • NeurIPS 2022 Ost: Improving generalization of deepfake detection via one-shot test-time training. [paper]
  • CIKM 2020 Towards generalizable deepfake detection with locality-aware autoencoder. [paper]

Layer 2: Spatiotemporal Consistency

A. Temporal and motion inconsistencies

  • CVPR 2026 SAGA: Source Attribution of Generative AI Videos. [paper]
  • CVPR 2026 Training-Free Detection of Generated Videos via Spatial-Temporal Likelihoods. [paper]
  • Expert Systems with Applications 2026 Robust Deepfake Detection in Compressed Videos with Scalable Network Strategies. [paper]
  • Scientific Reports 2026 A Spatiotemporal Defect-Integrated Deepfake Video Detection and Forgery Algorithm Attribution Model. [paper]
  • IEEE TCSVT 2026 Robust AI-Generated Video Detection via Color-Agnostic Contrastive Curriculum Learning with Color-Aware Feature Modulation. [paper]
  • Discover AI 2026 A Novel Temporal Attention Regularization Loss for Robust and Explainable Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 Rethinking the Readout: Unlocking Video Backbones for AI-Generated Video Detection. [paper]
  • ECCV 2026 (author-reported) SPLIT: Training-Free AI-Generated and Partially Edited Video Detection via Spatial Patch-Level Incoherence and Temporal Roughness. [paper]
  • ICME 2026 (author-reported) LoCC: Detection and Localization of Lip-Syncing Deepfakes via Counterfactual Frame Consistency. [paper]
  • CVPRW 2026 From Detector Evidence to Language: Explainable Deepfake Video Detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 ReConFuse: Reconstruction-Error Guided Semantic Fusion for AI-Generated Video Detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 Scalable, Energy-Efficient Optical-Neural Architecture for Multiplexed Deepfake Video Detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 CAM-VFD: Cross-Attention Multimodal Video Forgery Detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 Detecting AI-Generated Videos with Spiking Neural Networks. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 DYMAPIA: A Multi-Domain Framework for Detecting AI-Based Video Manipulation. [paper]
  • ICASSP 2026 Towards Robust Cross-Compression Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • ICLR 2026 Preserving Forgery Artifacts: AI-Generated Video Detection at Native Scale. [paper]
  • WACV 2026 SVD-Det: A Lightweight Framework for Video Forgery Detection Using Semantic and Visual Defect Cues. [paper]
  • WACV 2026 Training-free Detection of Text-to-video Generations via Over-coherence. [paper]
  • Neurocomputing 2026 Detecting AI-Generated Videos via Global Semantic Awareness and Inter-Frame Semantic Consistency. [paper]
  • Signal Processing: Image Communication 2026 3D Differential Decomposition for Video Deepfake Detection with Identity Suppression. [paper]
  • IEEE Access 2026 Beyond Frames: 3D-CoAtNet for Generalizable Deepfake Video Detection. [paper]
  • IEEE TBIOM 2026 Dual Frequency-Guided Spatiotemporal Feature Learning for Face Forgery Detection. [paper]
  • Knowledge-Based Systems 2026 CAST: Cross-Attentive Spatio-Temporal Feature Fusion for Deepfake Detection. [paper] [arXiv]
  • ICME 2025 GC-ConsFlow: Leveraging Optical Flow Residuals and Global Context for Robust Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • CVPR 2025 Generalizing deepfake video detection with plug-and-play: Video-level blending and spatiotemporal adapter tuning. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 Vulnerability-Aware Spatio-Temporal Learning for Generalizable and Interpretable Deepfake Video Detection. [paper]
  • ECCV 2024 Learning natural consistency representation for face forgery video detection. [paper]
  • IJCV 2024 Learning spatiotemporal inconsistency via thumbnail layout for face deepfake detection. [paper]
  • ICME 2025 Decof: Generated video detection via frame consistency. [paper]
  • IEEE TIFS 2023 Dynamic difference learning with spatio--temporal correlation for deepfake video detection. [paper]
  • ICCV 2023 Tall: Thumbnail layout for deepfake video detection. [paper]
  • IJCAI 2022 Region-Aware Temporal Inconsistency Learning for DeepFake Video Detection. [paper]
  • ICIAP 2022 Combining efficientnet and vision transformers for video deepfake detection. [paper]
  • AAAI 2022 Delving into the local: Dynamic inconsistency learning for deepfake video detection. [paper]
  • ACM MM 2021 Spatiotemporal inconsistency learning for deepfake video detection. [paper]
  • IJCAI 2021 Detecting Deepfake Videos with Temporal Dropout 3DCNN. [paper]
  • IJCAI 2021 Dynamic Inconsistency-aware DeepFake Video Detection. [paper]
  • WACV 2021 Interpretable and trustworthy deepfake detection via dynamic prototypes. [paper]
  • ECCV 2020 Two-branch recurrent network for isolating deepfakes in videos. [paper]
  • ACM MM 2020 Sharp multiple instance learning for deepfake video detection. [paper]
  • ICME 2020 Fsspotter: Spotting face-swapped video by spatial and temporal clues. [paper]

B. Physical and frequency artifacts

  • arXiv 2026 Revealing Artifacts via Noise Amplification: A Novel Perspective for AI-Generated Video Detection. [paper]
  • ISWA 2026 VIDS-Guard: A Novel Forensics-Aware Multi-Stream Transformer Framework for Robust Deepfake Video Detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 Exposing and Mitigating Temporal Attack in Deepfake Video Detection. [paper]
  • ICML 2026 Beyond Pixels: Mining Compressed Domain Artifacts for Efficient AI-Generated Video Detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 Aletheia: Physics-Conditioned Localized Artifact Attention (PhyLAA-X) for End-to-End Generalizable and Robust Deepfake Video Detection. [paper]
  • ICASSP 2026 Deep Video Frame Interpolation Detection Via Event-Guided Temporal Analysis and High-Frequency Artifacts. [paper]
  • ECCV 2026 (author-reported) Moiré Video Authentication: A Physical Signature Against AI Video Generation. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 MPF-Net: Exposing High-Fidelity AI-Generated Video Forgeries via Hierarchical Manifold Deviation and Micro-Temporal Fluctuations. [paper]
  • ICCV 2025 D3: Training-Free AI-Generated Video Detection Using Second-Order Features. [paper]
  • NeurIPS 2025 Physics-Driven Spatiotemporal Modeling for AI-Generated Video Detection. [paper]
  • NeurIPS 2025 AI-Generated Video Detection via Perceptual Straightening. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 Beyond Spatial Frequency: Pixel-wise Temporal Frequency-based Deepfake Video Detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 Leveraging Pre-Trained Visual Models for AI-Generated Video Detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 De-Fake: Style based Anomaly Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 Seeing What Matters: Generalizable AI-generated Video Detection with Forensic-Oriented Augmentation. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 VoD: Learning Volume of Differences for Video-Based Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • WACV 2025 DiffFake: Exposing Deepfakes using Differential Anomaly Detection. [paper]
  • IEEE TMM 2024 DIP: diffusion learning of inconsistency pattern for general deepfake detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2024 A quality-centric framework for generic deepfake detection. [paper]
  • CVPRW 2020 Towards untrusted social video verification to combat deepfakes via face geometry consistency. [paper]

C. Human behavioral and interaction dynamics

  • CVPR 2026 Learning Forgery-Aware Lip Representations Without Forgery Priors. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 Interpretable Facial Dynamics as Behavioral and Perceptual Traces of Deepfakes. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 BioLip: Language-Generalizable Lip-Sync Deepfake Detection via Biomechanical Constraint Violation Modeling. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 DeepFake Detection in Dyadic Video Calls using Point of Gaze Tracking. [paper]
  • WACVW 2026 Detecting Deepfake Talking Heads from Facial Biometric Anomalies. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 When Deepfake Detection Meets Graph Neural Network: a Unified and Lightweight Learning Framework. [paper]
  • CVPR 2025 Detecting Localized Deepfake Manipulations Using Action Unit-Guided Video Representations. [paper]
  • IEEE TCSVT 2023 Exploiting complementary dynamic incoherence for deepfake video detection. [paper]
  • CVPR 2021 Lips Don't Lie: A Generalisable and Robust Approach To Face Forgery Detection. [paper]
  • WIFS 2020 Detecting deep-fake videos from appearance and behavior. [paper]
  • arXiv 2020 Identity-driven deepfake detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2020 Emotions Don't Lie: An Audio-Visual Deepfake Detection Method Using Affective Cues. [paper]

Layer 3: Cross-Modal Consistency

A. Audio-visual consistency detection

  • PRCV 2025 (LNCS 2026) Towards Highly Generalized Lip-Sync Deepfake Detection via Detailed Audio-Visual Inconsistency Analysis. [paper]
  • Knowledge-Based Systems 2026 AMID: Audio-Visual Deepfake Detection via Adaptive Multi-Dimensional Interaction Modeling. [paper]
  • IEEE TCSVT 2026 AVIR: Audio-Visual Information Refinement for Robust Multimodal Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 Leave No Stone Unturned: Uncovering Holistic Audio-Visual Intrinsic Coherence for Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • IEEE TCSS 2026 VATS: Visual-Audio Multitask Transformer With Specialty Audio Encoder for Multimodal Deepfake Detection in CPSS. [paper]
  • Neurocomputing 2026 AVSCNet: A Dual-Branch Network for Synchronization Detection and Content Consistency Learning in Audio-Video Forgery Detection. [paper]
  • Neural Networks 2026 Emotion-Aware Multimodal Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 Teacher--Student Structure for Domain Adaptation in Ensemble Audio--Visual Video Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • SAFE@CVPRW 2026 EMO-BOOST: Emotion-Augmented Audio-Visual Features for Improved Generalization in Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • ICML 2026 From Talking to Singing: A New Challenge for Audio-Visual Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 Are DeepFakes Realistic Enough? Exploring Semantic Mismatch as a Novel Challenge. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 Attribution-Guided Multimodal Deepfake Detection via Cross-Modal Forensic Fingerprints. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 Listening Deepfake Detection: A New Perspective Beyond Speaking-Centric Forgery Analysis. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 Generalizing Video DeepFake Detection by Self-Generated Audio-Visual Pseudo-Fakes. [paper]
  • ICASSP 2026 MSCT: Differential Cross-Modal Attention for Deepfake Detection. [paper] [arXiv]
  • ICASSP 2026 AVATAR: Audio-Visual Adaptive Fusion via Trained Agent Reinforcement for Multimodal Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • ICASSP 2026 HybridMask: Facial-Guided Cross-Modal Fusion for Multimodal Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • CVPR 2026 X-AVDT: Audio-Visual Cross-Attention for Robust Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • ICASSP 2026 Leveraging Large Multimodal Models for Audio-Video Deepfake Detection: A Pilot Study. [paper] [arXiv]
  • Findings of EACL 2026 Revealing the Truth with ConLLM for Detecting Multi-Modal Deepfakes. [paper]
  • CVPR 2026 Investigating Self-Supervised Representations for Audio-Visual Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • IEEE TIFS 2026 Toward Generalizable Deepfake Detection via Forgery-Aware Audio-Visual Adaptation: A Variational Bayesian Approach. [paper]
  • Information Fusion 2026 Improving Deepfake Detection with Predictive Inter-Modal Alignment and Feature Reconstruction in Audio-Visual Asynchrony Scenarios. [paper]
  • IEEE TIFS 2026 FauForensics: Boosting Audio-Visual Deepfake Detection With Facial Action Units. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 PIA: Deepfake Detection Using Phoneme-Temporal and Identity-Dynamic Analysis. [paper]
  • ACM MM 2025 KLASSify to Verify: Audio-Visual Deepfake Detection Using SSL-based Audio and Handcrafted Visual Features. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 CAD: A General Multimodal Framework for Video Deepfake Detection via Cross-Modal Alignment and Distillation. [paper]
  • AAAI 2025 Multi-modal deepfake detection via multi-task audio-visual prompt learning. [paper]
  • CVPRW 2024 Lost in Translation: Lip-Sync Deepfake Detection from Audio-Video Mismatch. [paper]
  • CVPR 2024 AVFF: Audio-Visual Feature Fusion for Video Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • Interspeech 2024 Zero-Shot Fake Video Detection by Audio-Visual Consistency. [paper]
  • ACM TOMM 2023 Voice-Face Homogeneity Tells Deepfake. [paper]
  • IEEE URTC 2023 Integrating Audio-Visual Features for Multimodal Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • APSIPA ASC 2022 Lip Sync Matters: A Novel Multimodal Forgery Detector. [paper]
  • CVPRW 2023 Audio-Visual Person-of-Interest DeepFake Detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2022 An Audio-Visual Attention Based Multimodal Network for Fake Talking Face Videos Detection. [paper]
  • ICCV 2021 Joint Audio-Visual Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • ICME 2021 DeepFake Videos Detection Using Self-Supervised Decoupling Network. [paper]
  • CVPRW 2021 Detecting Deep-Fake Videos From Aural and Oral Dynamics. [paper]
  • IEEE TIFS 2021 Preventing DeepFake Attacks on Speaker Authentication by Dynamic Lip Movement Analysis. [paper]
  • ACM MM 2020 Not made for each other- Audio-Visual Dissonance-based Deepfake Detection and Localization. [paper]

B. Text-video semantic consistency reasoning

  • Future Internet 2026 Video Deepfake Detection Based on Multimodality Semantic Consistency Fusion. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 CMTA: Leveraging Cross-Modal Temporal Artifacts for Generalizable AI-Generated Video Detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 ATSS: Detecting AI-Generated Videos via Anomalous Temporal Self-Similarity. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 T^3SVFND: Towards an Evolving Fake News Detector for Emergencies with Test-time Training on Short Video Platforms. [paper]
  • CVPR 2025 Unleashing the Potential of Consistency Learning for Detecting and Grounding Multi-Modal Media Manipulation. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 Consistency-aware Fake Videos Detection on Short Video Platforms. [paper]

C. Robust learning and temporal localization

  • CVPR 2026 GEM-TFL: Bridging Weak and Full Supervision for Forgery Localization through EM-Guided Decomposition and Temporal Refinement. [paper]
  • Alexandria Engineering Journal 2026 CCFormer: A Cascaded Transformer Framework for Precise Temporal Audio-Visual Deepfake Localization. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 EVAS: Efficient Multimodal Temporal Forgery Localization via Audio-Visual Synergy and Steered Boundary Calibration. [paper]
  • ECCV 2026 (author-reported) MG-RWKV: Multi-Grained Context-Aware RWKV for Temporal Forgery Localization. [paper]
  • CVPR 2026 Inconsistency-Aware Multimodal Schrödinger Bridge for Deepfake Localization. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 Towards Multi-Modal Forgery Representation Learning for AI-Generated Video Detection and Localization. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 Divide and Conquer: Multimodal Video Deepfake Detection via Cross-Modal Fusion and Localization. [paper]
  • WACV 2026 A-V Representation Learning via Audio Shift Prediction for Multimodal Deepfake Detection and Temporal Localization. [paper]
  • WACV 2026 AuViRe: Audio-visual Speech Representation Reconstruction for Deepfake Temporal Localization. [paper]
  • ACM MM 2025 HOLA: Enhancing Audio-visual Deepfake Detection via Hierarchical Contextual Aggregations and Efficient Pre-training. [paper]
  • ACM MM 2025 A Multimodal Deviation Perceiving Framework for Weakly-Supervised Temporal Forgery Localization. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 SpeechForensics: Audio-Visual Speech Representation Learning for Face Forgery Detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 Weakly Supervised Multimodal Temporal Forgery Localization via Multitask Learning. [paper]
  • CVPR 2025 Circumventing Shortcuts in Audio-visual Deepfake Detection Datasets with Unsupervised Learning. [paper]
  • ICASSP 2025 Audio-Visual Deepfake Detection With Local Temporal Inconsistencies. [paper]
  • arXiv 2024 DiMoDif: Discourse Modality-information Differentiation for Audio-visual Deepfake Detection and Localization. [paper]
  • ICASSP 2024 Cross-Modality and Within-Modality Regularization for Audio-Visual DeepFake Detection. [paper]
  • CVPR 2023 Self-supervised video forensics by audio-visual anomaly detection. [paper]

Layer 4: World-Level Reasoning

A. Prompts and adapters for representation calibration

  • International Journal of Digital Crime and Forensics 2026 Vision Forgery Trace Enhanced VLMs for Generalized AIGC Video Detection. [paper]
  • CVPR 2026 Unleashing Vision-Language Semantics for Deepfake Video Detection. [paper]
  • ICML 2025 Unlocking the Capabilities of Large Vision-Language Models for Generalizable and Explainable Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • WACV 2026 AuthGuard: Generalizable Deepfake Detection via Language Guidance. [paper]
  • AAAI 2025 Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Reprogramming Visual-Language Model for General Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • IJCV 2025 DeepFake-Adapter: Dual-Level Adapter for DeepFake Detection. [paper]
  • BMVC 2024 Prompt-guided Multi-modal contrastive learning for Cross-compression-rate Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • CVPRW 2024 Can ChatGPT Detect DeepFakes? A Study of Using Multimodal Large Language Models for Media Forensics. [paper]
  • APSIPA TSIP 2025 How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception. [paper]

B. Evidence-guided and agentic systems

  • ECCV 2026 (author-reported) SafeGuard: A Multi-Agent Perception-Reasoning Framework for Social-Risk AI-Generated Video Detection. [paper]
  • CVPR 2026 VMD-FACT: A New Video Dataset and MLLM-Based Method for Detecting Realistic AI-Generated Video Misinformation. [paper]
  • ICML 2026 Explainable Forensics of Manipulated Segments in Untrimmed Long Videos. [paper]
  • ICML 2026 Hermes: An Evidence-Driven Agentic Framework for Trustworthy and Explainable AI-Generated Video Detection. [paper]
  • CVPR 2026 CoCoVideo: The High-Quality Commercial-Model-Based Contrastive Benchmark for AI-Generated Video Detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 DVAR: Adversarial Multi-Agent Debate for Video Authenticity Detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 DeepAgent: A Dual Stream Multi Agent Fusion for Robust Multimodal Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 Memory-Anchored Multimodal Reasoning for Explainable Video Forensics. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 DAVID-XR1: Detecting AI-Generated Videos with Explainable Reasoning. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 LAVID: An Agentic LVLM Framework for Diffusion-Generated Video Detection. [paper]

C. Post-training, preferences and rewards

  • ICML 2026 VideoVeritas: AI-Generated Video Detection via Perception Pretext Reinforcement Learning. [paper]
  • CVPR 2026 Skyra: AI-Generated Video Detection via Grounded Artifact Reasoning. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 VidGuard-R1: AI-Generated Video Detection and Explanation via Reasoning MLLMs and RL. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 EDVD-LLaMA: Explainable Deepfake Video Detection via Multimodal Large Language Model Reasoning. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 Learning Human-Perceived Fakeness in AI-Generated Videos via Multimodal LLMs. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 Veritas: Generalizable Deepfake Detection via Pattern-Aware Reasoning. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 BusterX++: Towards Unified Cross-Modal AI-Generated Content Detection and Explanation with MLLM. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 BusterX: MLLM-Powered AI-Generated Video Forgery Detection and Explanation. [paper]
  • arXiv 2024 X2-DFD: A framework for eXplainable and eXtendable Deepfake Detection. [paper]

Benchmarks: Local Manipulation Video

Local Manipulation Video (LMV)

  • arXiv 2026 HumanForge: A Human-Centric Deepfake Video Benchmark with Multi-Agent Forgery Rationales. [paper]
  • CVPR 2026 DeepfakeImpact: A Two-Stage Benchmark with Real-World Impact in Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 Detecting Temporally Localized Manipulations in Authentic Video Streams. [paper]
  • ICML 2026 Explainable Forensics of Manipulated Segments in Untrimmed Long Videos. [paper]
  • CVPR 2026 ActivityForensics: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Localizing Manipulated Activity in Videos. [paper]
  • Machine Vision and Applications 2026 Cross-Dataset Video Deepfake Detection Using Transformer and CNN Architectures (introduces ReenactFaces). [paper]
  • CVPR Findings 2026 Beyond Static Artifacts: A Forensic Benchmark for Video Deepfake Reasoning in Vision Language Models. [paper]
  • WACV 2026 Exddv: A new dataset for explainable deepfake detection in video. [paper]
  • ECCV 2024 Common sense reasoning for deepfake detection. [paper]
  • CVPR 2025 Ai-face: A million-scale demographically annotated ai-generated face dataset and fairness benchmark. [paper]
  • NeurIPS 2023 DeepfakeBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • CVPR 2023 DF-Platter: Multi-Face Heterogeneous Deepfake Dataset. [paper]
  • WACV 2023 A Continual Deepfake Detection Benchmark: Dataset, Methods, and Essentials. [paper]
  • ICCV 2021 Kodf: A large-scale korean deepfake detection dataset. [paper]
  • CVPR 2021 ForgeryNet: A Versatile Benchmark for Comprehensive Forgery Analysis. [paper]
  • ACM MM 2020 WildDeepfake: A Challenging Real-World Dataset for Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2020 The DeepFake Detection Challenge (DFDC) Dataset. [paper]
  • CVPR 2020 DeeperForensics-1.0: A Large-Scale Dataset for Real-World Face Forgery Detection. [paper]
  • CVPR 2020 Celeb-df: A large-scale challenging dataset for deepfake forensics. [paper]
  • ICCV 2019 Faceforensics++: Learning to detect manipulated facial images. [paper]

Benchmarks: Audio-Visual Editing

Audio-Visual Editing (AVE)

  • CVPR 2026 VMD-FACT: A New Video Dataset and MLLM-Based Method for Detecting Realistic AI-Generated Video Misinformation. [paper]
  • CVPR 2026 AVFakeBench: A Comprehensive Audio-Video Forgery Detection Benchmark for AV-LMMs. [paper]
  • CVPR 2026 X-AVDT: Audio-Visual Cross-Attention for Robust Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • ACM MM 2025 Av-deepfake1m++: A large-scale audio-visual deepfake benchmark with real-world perturbations. [paper]
  • Interspeech 2025 VCapAV: A Video-Caption Based Audio-Visual Deepfake Detection Dataset. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 Memory-Anchored Multimodal Reasoning for Explainable Video Forensics. [paper]
  • ACM MMAD Workshop 2025 SocialDF: Benchmark Dataset and Detection Model for Mitigating Harmful Deepfake Content on Social Media Platforms. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 Tell me Habibi, is it Real or Fake? [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 MAVOS-DD: Multilingual Audio-Video Open-Set Deepfake Detection Benchmark. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 Beyond Face Swapping: A Diffusion-Based Digital Human Benchmark for Multimodal Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • WACV 2026 TalkingHeadBench: A Multi-Modal Benchmark & Analysis of Talking-Head DeepFake Detection. [paper]
  • ACM MM 2024 AV-Deepfake1M: A large-scale LLM-driven audio-visual deepfake dataset. [paper]
  • arXiv 2024 WWW: Where, Which and Whatever Enhancing Interpretability in Multimodal Deepfake Detection. [paper]
  • DICTA 2022 Do you really mean that? content driven audio-visual deepfake dataset and multimodal method for temporal forgery localization. [paper]
  • arXiv 2021 FakeAVCeleb: A Novel Audio-Video Multimodal Deepfake Dataset. [paper]

Benchmarks: Generative Video Synthesis

Generative Video Synthesis (GVS)

  • CVPR 2026 Training-Free Detection of Generated Videos via Spatial-Temporal Likelihoods. [paper]
  • ECCV 2026 (author-reported) SafeGuard: A Multi-Agent Perception-Reasoning Framework for Social-Risk AI-Generated Video Detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 Auditing Generalization in AI-Generated Video Detection: A Six-Control Protocol and the VidAudit Toolkit. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 Revealing Artifacts via Noise Amplification: A Novel Perspective for AI-Generated Video Detection. [paper]
  • CVPR 2026 FVBench: Benchmarking Deepfake Video Detection Capability of Large Multimodal Models. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 Artifact-Bench: Evaluating MLLMs on Detecting and Assessing the Artifacts of AI-Generated Videos. [paper]
  • CVPR 2026 CoCoVideo: The High-Quality Commercial-Model-Based Contrastive Benchmark for AI-Generated Video Detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 Advancing Reliable Synthetic Video Detection: Insights from the SAFE Challenge. [paper]
  • ICLR 2026 Preserving Forgery Artifacts: AI-Generated Video Detection at Native Scale. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 SynthForensics: A Multi-Generator Benchmark for Detecting Synthetic Video Deepfakes. [paper]
  • ICML 2026 VideoVeritas: AI-Generated Video Detection via Perception Pretext Reinforcement Learning. [paper]
  • CVPR 2026 Your One-Stop Solution for AI-Generated Video Detection. [paper]
  • CVPR 2026 Skyra: AI-Generated Video Detection via Grounded Artifact Reasoning. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 Video Reality Test: Can AI-Generated ASMR Videos fool VLMs and Humans? [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 EDVD-LLaMA: Explainable Deepfake Video Detection via Multimodal Large Language Model Reasoning. [paper]
  • ACM MM 2025 AEGIS: Authenticity Evaluation Benchmark for AI-Generated Video Sequences. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 Learning Human-Perceived Fakeness in AI-Generated Videos via Multimodal LLMs. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 BusterX++: Towards Unified Cross-Modal AI-Generated Content Detection and Explanation with MLLM. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 GenWorld: Towards Detecting AI-generated Real-world Simulation Videos. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 Ivy-fake: A unified explainable framework and benchmark for image and video aigc detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 DAVID-XR1: Detecting AI-Generated Videos with Explainable Reasoning. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 BusterX: MLLM-Powered AI-Generated Video Forgery Detection and Explanation. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 Deepfake-eval-2024: A multi-modal in-the-wild benchmark of deepfakes circulated in 2024. [paper]
  • AAAI 2026 Genvidbench: A challenging benchmark for detecting ai-generated video. [paper]
  • NeurIPS 2024 On Learning Multi-Modal Forgery Representation for Diffusion Generated Video Detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2024 Distinguish any fake videos: Unleashing the power of large-scale data and motion features. [paper]
  • arXiv 2024 DeMamba: AI-Generated Video Detection on Million-Scale GenVideo Benchmark. [paper]
  • arXiv 2024 Detecting AI-Generated Video via Frame Consistency. [paper]

Benchmarks: Adjacent Diagnostics

A. Physical Rule Violations

  • arXiv 2026 Physion-Eval: Evaluating Physical Realism in Generated Video via Human Reasoning. [paper]
  • ICLR 2026 VideoPhy-2: A Challenging Action-Centric Physical Commonsense Evaluation in Video Generation. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 PhyWorldBench: A Physical Realism Benchmark for Text-to-Video Generation. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 T2VPhysBench: A First-Principles Benchmark for Physical Consistency in Text-to-Video Generation. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 Morpheus: Benchmarking Physical Reasoning of Video Generative Models with Real Physical Experiments. [paper]
  • ICML 2025 Impossible Videos. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 Do generative video models understand physical principles? [paper]
  • ICLR 2025 VideoPhy: Evaluating Physical Commonsense for Video Generation. [paper]

B. World Dynamics and Causality

  • arXiv 2025 SVBench: Evaluation of Video Generation Models on Social Reasoning. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 VideoVerse: How Far is Your T2V Generator from a World Model? [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 T2VWorldBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating World Knowledge in Text-to-Video Generation. [paper]
  • arXiv 2024 Is Your World Simulator a Good Story Presenter? A Consecutive Events-Based Benchmark for Future Long Video Generation. [paper]
  • ICML 2025 WorldSimBench: Towards Video Generation Models as World Simulators. [paper]
  • ICML 2025 Towards World Simulator: Crafting Physical Commonsense-Based Benchmark for Video Generation. [paper]

C. Explanation-Oriented Diagnosis

  • NeurIPS 2025 VideoHallu: Evaluating and Mitigating Multi-modal Hallucinations on Synthetic Video Understanding. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 PhyDetEx: A Benchmark Dataset and Method for Detecting and Explaining Physical Plausibility in Text-to-Video Models. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 SPOTLIGHT: Identifying and Localizing Video Generation Errors Using VLMs. [paper]
  • arXiv 2025 TRAVL: A Recipe for Making Video-Language Models Better Judges of Physics Implausibility. [paper]

D. Detector Robustness Audits

  • arXiv 2026 Continuously Evolving Deepfake Detection: An Architecture and Public-Benchmark Evaluation of a Dynamic Detection System. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 Dataset Biases and Shortcut Learning in Motion-Based AI-Generated Video Detection. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 When AUC Misleads: Polarization-Aware Evaluation of Deepfake Detectors under Domain Shift. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 Auditing Generalization in AI-Generated Video Detection: A Six-Control Protocol and the VidAudit Toolkit. [paper]

E. Source-Side Authentication (Adjacent, Not Counted)

  • arXiv 2026 GIFGuard: Proactive Forensics against Deepfakes in Facial GIFs via Spatiotemporal Watermarking. [paper]
  • arXiv 2026 LAVA: Layered Audio-Visual Anti-tampering Watermarking for Robust Deepfake Detection and Localization. [paper]

F. Human Detection Studies

  • ROMCIR 2026 Beyond Seeing Is Believing: On Crowdsourced Detection of Audiovisual Deepfakes. [paper]
Challenges and Future

Toward evidence-first and trustworthy AIGC-V detection.

The next phase is not just stronger clip-level discrimination. It requires diagnostic evaluation, claim-level supervision, unified explainable detection, and deployment protocols that preserve calibration when evidence is weak, conflicting, or incomplete.

01

Robust diagnostic evaluation

Move beyond clip-level AUC or EER. Evaluation should reveal which factual proposition fails, where the violation occurs, and how brittle the detector becomes under shift, transfer, codec changes, and modern synthesis pipelines.

02

Claim-level and dynamic evaluation

Benchmarks should move from clip labels to checkable claims with timestamped evidence, targeted stress tests, and continuously refreshed generator pools rather than static one-off test sets.

03

Unified explainable detection

Trustworthy AIGC-V detection is a two-pathway problem: perceptual evidence plus fact-level verification. Cross-layer fusion should preserve low-level traces, localized mismatches, and tested claims as individually inspectable evidence objects.

04

Evidence-first trustworthy detection

Systems should identify, localize, and explain with calibrated uncertainty, provenance-aware cross-checks, and abstention when evidence remains incomplete or internally contradictory.

Broader research direction Progress on trustworthy AIGC-V detection will likely require tighter collaboration between CV and NLP: CV contributes grounded perceptual and spatiotemporal evidence, while NLP contributes claim decomposition, retrieval, reasoning, grounding, and evidence-aware explanation in a unified evidence graph that also supports provenance checks, calibration, and abstention.
Community

Help keep the library video-first.

We welcome missing papers, corrected venue records, code links, and benchmark updates. Please identify the proposed taxonomy layer and the evidence actually consumed by the detector.

In scope

Video is the primary task.

The paper should centrally address AI-generated or manipulated video detection, localization, explanation, or detector evaluation. Audio-visual work qualifies when a video clip is genuinely analyzed.

Out of scope

Video is only incidental.

Image-first deepfake papers and broad synthetic-media benchmarks are excluded when video is only a small auxiliary modality. Venue and first-public dates should resolve to primary sources.

Citation

Citation.

If you use this survey or its taxonomy in your work, please cite it as follows.

@inproceedings{Hou_2026,
   title={Detecting AI-Generated Video: A Vision–Language Dual-View Survey},
   url={http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.1613},
   DOI={10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.1613},
   booktitle={Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026},
   publisher={Association for Computational Linguistics},
   author={Hou, Dylan Xinming and Zhang, Juntian and Gu, Xu and Wu, Yichen and Lukas, Nils and Xia, Gus and Chen, Xiuying and Liu, Yuhan},
   year={2026},
   pages={32221–32255} }